Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A New Strategy to Evaluate Technical Efficiency in Hospitals Using Homogeneous Groups of Casemix

How to Evaluate When There is Not DRGs?

Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The public health system has restricted economic resources. Because of that, it is necessary to know how the resources are being used and if they are properly distributed. Several works have applied classical approaches based in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) for this purpose. However, if we have hospitals with different casemix, this is not the best approach. In order to avoid biases in the comparisons, other works have recommended the use of hospital production data corrected by the weights from Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs), to adjust the casemix of hospitals. However, not all countries have this tool fully implemented, which limits the efficiency evaluation. This paper proposes a new approach for evaluating the efficiency of hospitals. It uses a graph-based clustering algorithm to find groups of hospitals that have similar production profiles. Then, DEA is used to evaluate the technical efficiency of each group. The proposed approach is tested using the production data from 2014 of 193 Chilean public hospitals. The results allowed to identify different performance profiles of each group, that differs from other studies that employs data from partially implemented DRGs. Our results are able to deliver a better description of the resource management of the different groups of hospitals. We have created a website with the results (bioinformatic.diinf.usach.cl/publichealth). Data can be requested to the authors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alonso, J., Clifton, J., Díaz-Fuentes, D., The impact of new public management on efficiency: An analysis of Madrid’s hospitals. Health Policy 119(3):333–340, 2015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Amin, M., Makarem, S. C., Rosko, M.: Efficiency and hospital effectiveness in improving hospital consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems ratings. Health Care Manage Rev. 2015 Jun 19. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID:26099007

  3. Hadji, B., Meyer, R., Melikeche, S., Escalon, S., Degoulet, P., Assessing the relationships between hospital resources and activities: A systematic review. J. Med. Syst. 38(10):127–148, 2014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Asandului, L., Roman, M., Fatulescu, P., The efficiency of healthcare systems in Europe: A data envelopment analysis approach. Procedia Econ. Finance 10:261–268, 2014. International Conference on Applied Statistics (ICAS) 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goudarzi, R., Pourreza, A., Shokoohi, M., Askari, R., Mahdavi, M., Moghri, J., Technical efficiency of teaching hospitals in Iran: The use of Stochastic Frontier Analysis, 1999–2011. Int. J. Health Policy Manag. 3(2): 91–97, 2014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Neill, L., Rauner, M., Heidenberger, K., Kraus, M., A cross-national comparison and taxonomy of DEA-based hospital efficiency studies. Socio Econ. Plan. Sci. 42(3):158–189, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rezaee, M. J., and Karimdadi, A., Do geographical locations affect in hospitals performance? A multi-group data envelopment analysis. J. Med. Syst. 39(9):278, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Herwartz, H., and Strumann, C., Hospital efficiency under prospective reimbursement schemes: An empirical assessment for the case of Germany. Eur. J. Health Econ. 15(2):175–186, 2014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Santelices, E., Ormeño, H., Delgado, M., Christopher, M., Valdés, R., Durán, L., Analisis de la eficiencia técnica hospitalaria 2011́. Rev. Méd. Chile 141:332–337, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Linna, M., Häkkinen, U., Peltola, M., Magnussen, J., Anthun, K., Kittelsen, S., Roed, A., Olsen, K., Medin, E., Rehnberg, C., Measuring cost efficiency in the Nordic Hospitals—a cross-sectional comparison of public hospitals in 2002. Health Care Manag. Sci. 13(4):346–357, 2010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Vitikainen, K., Linna, M., Street, A., Substituting inpatient for outpatient care: What is the impact on hospital costs and efficiency? Eur. J. Health Econ. 11(4):395–404, 2010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Magnussen, J., and Nyland, K., Measuring efficiency in clinical departments. Health Policy 87(1):1–7, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gannon, B., Testing for variation in technical efficiency of hospitals in Ireland. Technical report, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), 2005.

  14. Wang, Z., Liu, R., Li, P., Jiang, C., Hao, M., How to make diagnosis related groups payment more feasible in developing countries—A case study in Shanghai, China. Iran. J. Public Health 43(5):572–578, 2014.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Jurges, H., and Koberlein, J., What explains DRG upcoding in neonatology? The roles of financial incentives and infant health. J. Health Econ. 43:13–26, 2015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jian, W., Lu, M., Han, W., Hu, M.: Introducing diagnosis-related groups: Is the information system ready? Int. J. Health Plan. Manage, 2014 Aug 11. doi:10.1002/hpm.2270

  17. Wardle, G., Wodchis, W. P., Laporte, A., Anderson, G.M, Ross-Baker, G., The sensitivity of adverse event cost estimates to diagnostic coding error. Health Serv. Res. 47:984–1007 , 2012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Schousboe, J. T., Paudel, M. L., Taylor, B. C., Mau, B. A., Virnig, L. W., Ensrud, K. E., Dowd, B. E., Estimation of standardised hospital costs from Medicare claims that reflect resource requirements for care: Impact for cohort studies linked to Medicare claims. Health Serv. Res. 49(3):929–949, 2014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Malyon, R., Zhao, Y., Oates, B., Differences in the cost of admitted patient care for indigenous people and people from remote locations. Aust. Health Rev. 37(1):26–31, 2013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jordan, I., Barry, H., Clancy, M., O’Toole, D., Machale, S., Financial impact of accurate discharge coding in a liaison psychiatry service. J. Psychosom. Res. 73(6):476–478, 2012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gan, G., Ma, C., Wu, J., , Data clustering - theory, algorithms, and applications. SIAM, 2007.

  22. Inostroza-Ponta, M., An integrated and scalable approach based on combinatorial optimisation techniques for the analysis of microarray data. University of Newcastle. School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2008.

  23. Jay, J. J., Eblen, J. D., Zhang, Y., Benson, M., Perkins, A. D., Saxton, A. M., Voy, B. H., Chesler, E. J., Langston, M. A., A systematic comparison of genome-scale clustering algorithms. BMC Bioinformatics 13 (Suppl 10):S7, 2012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Navulur, K., Multispectral image analysis using the object-oriented paradigm. Hoboken: CRC Press, 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Gang, C., Data envelopment analysis software and MaxDEA, 2014.

  26. Chen, G., Jaradat, S. A., Banerjee, N., Tanaka, T. S., Ko, M. S. H., Zhang, M. Q., Evaluation and comparison of clustering algorithms in anglyzing es cell gene expression data. Stat. Sin. 12:241–262, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sodani, P. R., and Madnani, G. M. K., Measuring hospital performance through data envelopment analysis: Understanding basic concepts to help novice researchers. J. Health Manag. 10(1):129–142, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Barnum, D., Johnson, M., Gleason, J., Importance of statistical evidence in estimating valid DEA scores. J. Med. Syst. 40(3):1, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Inostroza-Ponta, M., Berretta, R., Moscato, P., QAPgrid: A two level QAP-based approach for large-scale data analysis and visualisation. PLoS ONE 6(1):e14468, 2011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Clark, M. B., Johnston, R. L., Inostroza-Ponta, M., Fox, A. H., Fortini, E., Moscato, P., Dinger, M. E., Mattick, J. S., Genome-wide analysis of long noncoding RNA stability. Genome Res. 22(5):885–898, 2012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ramirez-Castrillon, M., Mendes, S. D., Inostroza-Ponta, M., Valente, P., (GTG)5 MSP-PCR fingerprinting as a technique for discrimination of wine associated yeasts? PLoS ONE 9(8):e105870, 2014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Arechabala-Mantuliz, M., Barrios-Araya, S., Catoni-Salamanca, M., Palma-Castro, E., Ibacache-Celedón, Y., Richards, J., Validación de un instrumento de medición de cuidados según dependencia y riesgo en pacientes en terapia de hemodiálisis crónica. Aquichán 14:473–484, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kumar, N., Efficiency analysis of banks using DEA: A review. Int. J. Adv. Res. Innov. 1:120–126, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Chilean Ministry of Health (Ministerio de Salud, MINSAL) and the South Metropolitan Health Service (Servicio de Salud Metropolitano Sur, SSMS) for their cooperation providing the data needed for this academic research. Special acknowledgements to Managers, Finance, Statistics and DRGs departments. MV-C would like to thank CITIAPS. This article was partially funded by Proyect PMI USA1204.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Inostroza-Ponta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Systems-Level Quality Improvement.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(TEX 56.5 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Villalobos-Cid, M., Chacón, M., Zitko, P. et al. A New Strategy to Evaluate Technical Efficiency in Hospitals Using Homogeneous Groups of Casemix. J Med Syst 40, 103 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-016-0458-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-016-0458-9

Keywords

Navigation