The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Economic Grand RoundsFull Access

The Swiss Mental Health Care System

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201700412

Abstract

The United States and Switzerland are among the world’s wealthiest countries. Both are highly innovative and entrepreneurial, ranking high in global competitiveness and innovation and with similar liberal economies. This column highlights features of the health care system in Switzerland, a country with an exclusively private health insurance system, with federally mandated universal health insurance. Residents can choose from about 58 insurance companies. Switzerland regulates these companies and negotiates reimbursement rates. The Swiss model of health care and its provision of comprehensive psychiatric and substance abuse treatment could inform policy as the United States considers major changes to its health care laws. Switzerland could serve as an example for developing a mental health care model that ensures appropriate services, with a high density of psychiatric inpatient facilities and mental health care providers, while maintaining affordable care.

The provision of needed mental health care is a worldwide challenge. Increasingly, health and mental health authorities are trying to improve performance, contain costs, and increase access to and quality of behavioral health care. Knowledge of other mental health care systems may provide valuable lessons to meet these challenging tasks, because structural differences in the delivery and financing of mental health care can be linked to differences in performance. Switzerland is among the world’s wealthiest countries and is highly entrepreneurial—a top-ranking country in terms of global competitiveness and innovation. Switzerland has liberal social and economic policies and strong values regarding democracy, individual freedom, human rights, and a market economy.

According to rankings of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the Swiss health care system is among the highest performers on many quality measures (1) (Table 1). Recently, it has been proposed as a model for a system committed to achieving universal coverage in the private health insurance sector (2). This column highlights features of the behavioral health system in Switzerland. Specifically, it looks at the Swiss mental health system, including organizational aspects, health care policies, and costs.

TABLE 1. Socioeconomic and health care parameters, United States and Switzerlanda

ParameterUnited StatesSwitzerland
Socioeconomic
 Area (square miles)3,796,74215,940
 Population, 2016323,127,5138,401,120
 Density, 2016 (persons per square mile)90.6523.2
 GDP (nominal) per capita, 2016 (US$)b57,46778,245
 Official languagesEnglishGerman, French, Italian, Romansh
 GovernmentFederal presidential constitutional republicFederal parliamentary directorial republic
General health care
 Health expenditures per capita: U.S., 2014; Swiss, 2015 (US$)9,5236,325
 Health expenditures in relation to GDP (%)b17.511.4
Mental health care
 Lifetime prevalence of psychiatric disorders: U.S., 2005; Swiss, 2012 (%)46.448.0
 Inpatient beds (per 1,000 inhabitants): U.S., 2011; Swiss, 2005.331.32
 Hospitalization rate (per 1,000 inhabitants)9.911.9
 Length of stay at psychiatric inpatient facilities (days)7.235.0
 Psychiatrists (per 1,000 inhabitants)14.126.4
 Mental health expenditures per insured person: U.S., 2006; Swiss, 2010 (US$)1,1041,035
 Total costs caused by alcohol consumption per capita (US$)746522

aSources: U.S. Department of Commerce (2017), Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2014), World Health Organization (2011 and 2016), Swiss Federal Office for Health (2015), and Swiss Federal Statistical Office (2011 and 2012)

bGDP, gross domestic product

TABLE 1. Socioeconomic and health care parameters, United States and Switzerlanda

Enlarge table

Swiss Health Care System

Switzerland has a permanent resident population of eight million and is structured as a federal directorial republic with 26 cantons, which are independent in all matters that are not specifically designated as the responsibility of the federal government. Switzerland has a private health care insurance system, with federally mandated insurance, and the cantons are responsible for the planning and delivery of health services, partial financing of hospitals, and provision of subsidies for insurance premiums (3). Residents can choose from about 60 different insurance companies. Every Swiss resident, including foreign citizens, is required to acquire statutory health insurance from competing insurance companies. In the case of financial hardship, local authorities will cover the expenses on the basis of income (subsidies). There is no government insurance program, such as Medicaid, for persons whose income and resources are insufficient to pay for health care. In Switzerland, the elderly, like the rest of the population, receive their care via these private insurers and do not receive any special financial considerations beyond the general subsidy (4). Swiss health insurers are required to offer comprehensive policies that cover a wide range of medical care. Employers do not provide health insurance for their workers, nor do they pay a tax for health care. However, employers must provide casualty insurance for accidents. Premiums for adults over the age of 26 do not vary by age or health status.

Table 1 presents comparative data on health care expenditures. The Swiss federal government regulates the health insurance market, including services covered and form of payment. Statutory health insurance benefit packages reimburse most primary care physicians and specialists and cover an extensive list of medications, physical therapy, and some preventive measures. Most health care providers in Switzerland stay within the reimbursement system because patients are readily able to access care and are unwilling to pay out of pocket. As a less expensive alternative (reductions up to 25%), residents can sign up for coverage with a health maintenance organization. In addition to the mandatory basic health insurance, residents may purchase complementary and supplementary premium packages to cover improved accommodation and free choice of hospital and treating physician (5).

To influence outpatient utilization and spending, the Swiss government introduced in 2004 the TARMED (French, tarif médical) tariff system for outpatient health services. It encompasses about 4,000 tariff positions, which label and assess services provided by physicians. The pricing of medical services with TARMED is calculated consistently throughout Switzerland with so-called tariff points. The canton and the health insurers negotiate the monetary value attributed to the tariff points for private and public institutional outpatient services (6). Also, in an attempt to regulate the supply side of health care, the Swiss government decided to freeze new accreditations for physicians in private practice in Switzerland based on the assumption that demand-induced health care spending may be cut by limiting care providers. The cantons have the jurisdiction to implement this law or to allow exemptions in case of a shortage of physicians in primary care or in certain specialties (7). Health insurers must provide mandatory insurance plans with different types of gatekeeping, such as health maintenance organizations, mandatory first visits to a designated primary care physician, or annual deductibles ranging from US$300 to US$2,500 a year.

Swiss Mental Health Care System

The prevalence of psychiatric illnesses in Switzerland is comparable to that in other developed countries (8,9). Mental health inpatient treatment is mainly provided by public general hospitals, state psychiatric hospitals, private psychiatric hospitals, and residential facilities. The canton financially supports public and private psychiatric hospitals that are on the government hospital list, which is determined by the government and confirmed through regular audits. Table 1 presents comparative data on hospitalization rates, length of stay, and mental health expenditures. The number of private hospitals is increasing in Switzerland, but the number of patients treated in inpatient settings has remained relatively stable in recent years (9).

The direct and indirect costs of psychiatric disorders, including costs due to alcohol consumption, are lower in Switzerland than in the United States. Primary care physicians, psychiatrists, psychologists, registered nurses in private practice, psychiatric outpatient clinics, public clinics, and visiting nurse services provide outpatient treatment. Fees for outpatient psychiatric services are calculated by using the TARMED tariff system, which regulates the rates for various procedures, including continuous psychotherapy if indicated. In private practice and outpatient clinics, reimbursement varies according to the monetary value attributed to the tariff points set by TARMED by the canton and the health insurance companies. The tariff points differ depending on the profession of the provider, for example, physician, psychologist, nurse, and social worker, and the procedures. Regardless of the health insurance or the insurance plan, providers receive their payments at similar rates for equivalent medical services, which avoids preferential treatment of patients on the basis of their insurance (6).

Coverage for intermediate levels of behavioral health care differs depending on the canton. However, most services, such as visiting mental health nurses (called Spitex) and day treatment programs, are covered and regulated according to the TARMED tariff points. Some cantons choose to negotiate certain intermediate health care services, such as home treatment or crisis intervention services, directly with the insurance companies, establishing a flat rate for the services rendered.

Swiss residents can receive outpatient mental health care in a variety of facilities, including private practices and public clinics. Patients are liable for a 10% copayment for outpatient services, up to a maximum of US$700 per year (10). For example, 60 minutes of psychotherapy provided by a psychiatrist in Zurich costs approximately US$200, with a US$20 copayment. The cost of medication varies according to the choice of brand versus generic products, with a 10% copayment for generic medications and a 20% copayment for brand-name medications (11). For example, a one-month supply of escitalopram 10 mg will cost the patient approximately US$50 for the brand-name drug, with a US$10 copay. The generic medication will cost about US$20, with a US$2 copay. In the United States, the same drug can cost the patient around $250 for the brand-name drug and $120 for the generic.

The canton and the basic health insurance companies share the cost of psychiatric hospitalizations, with the amount paid by the state varying by canton and on an annual basis. The patient is responsible for a copay of 10% until the maximum deductible of US$700 is reached. The costs of inpatient psychiatric care are calculated in the form of per diem rates. The rates decline with increasing length of stay, which creates an incentive to reduce the length of stay (12). The 2012 health law reform has shifted the methods of hospital financing. Switzerland will be switching to a performance-oriented reimbursement method for psychiatric inpatient treatment (13). In 2018, the government will implement the new tariff structure (TARPSY), which will be based on diagnosis-related groups and psychiatric cost groups, taking into consideration different severity and complexity ratings. The goal is to increase transparency and comparability of services, costs, and quality. It is not the goal of the new tariff system to solve the inherent tension between medical and economic interests but to create a tariff system that is based on data provided by the institutions and is able to adjust more quickly to new changes and challenges of the health care system. This Swiss model allows for psychiatric institutions to compete in a free market for complementary and supplementary premium services without jeopardizing basic mental health services for the entire population.

Conclusions

In Switzerland, independent health insurance companies compete on price and services covered but with a comprehensive package of essential minimum benefits, which include comprehensive mental health and substance abuse services. Switzerland uses collective bargaining power and a national reimbursement schedule to keep health care costs in check. The Swiss mental health care system provides broad and comprehensive coverage for all residents, with readily available inpatient and ambulatory capacity. Psychiatric patients are among the most vulnerable populations, and the Swiss model ensures appropriate mental health services, with a high density of psychiatric inpatient facilities and mental health care providers, while maintaining affordable health care.

Dr. Schneeberger is with Psychiatric Services Grisons, St. Moritz, Switzerland. He is also with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, where Dr. Schwartz is affiliated. Dr. Schwartz is also with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Montefiore Medical Center, New York. Steven S. Sharfstein, M.D., Haiden A. Huskamp, Ph.D., and Alison Evans Cuellar, Ph.D., are editors of this column.
Send correspondence to Dr. Schneeberger (e-mail: ).

The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

References

1 Making Mental Health Count: The Social and Economic Costs of Neglecting Mental Health Care. Paris, OECD Publishing, 2014Google Scholar

2 Herzlinger RE, Richman BD, Boxer RJ: Achieving universal coverage without turning to a single payer: lessons from 3 other countries. JAMA 317:1409–1410, 2017Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3 Biller-Andorno N, Zeltner T: Individual responsibility and community solidarity: the Swiss health care system. New England Journal of Medicine 373:2193–2197, 2015Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

4 Schwartz ND: Swiss health care thrives without public option. New York Times, Sept 30, 2009Google Scholar

5 Mossialos E, Wenzl M, Osborn R, et al.: International Profiles of Health Care Systems. New York, Commonwealth Fund, 2015Google Scholar

6 Trotta C, Lang U, Schneeberger A: Mental health care across two nations—Switzerland and the United States of America. Schweizer Archiv für Neurologie und Psychiatrie 164:165–169, 2013CrossrefGoogle Scholar

7 Busato A, Künzi B: Primary care physician supply and other key determinants of health care utilisation: the case of Switzerland. BMC Health Services Research 8:8, 2008Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

8 Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, et al.: Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry 62:593–602, 2005Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

9 Schuler D, Burla L: Mental health in Switzerland: Monitoring 2012 [in German]. Neuchâtel, Switzerland, Schweizerisches Gesundheitsobservatorium (Obsan), 2012Google Scholar

10 Busato A, Matter P, Künzi B, et al.: Geographic variation in the cost of ambulatory care in Switzerland. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 17:18–23, 2012Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

11 Kunz S: Mental health care policies and services in Switzerland. Irish Journal of Applied Social Studies 2:174–185, 2000Google Scholar

12 Wolff J, McCrone P, Patel A, et al.: Determinants of per diem hospital costs in mental health. PLoS One 11:e0152669, 2016Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

13 Federal Law on Health Insurance (Hospital Funding): State Law [in German]. Bern, Swiss Confederation, 2007Google Scholar